President-Elect Trump is planning to appoint congresswoman Elise Stefanik as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. It's Probably not a good idea.

Elise Stefanik, a Republican congresswoman from New York, has faced criticism from various groups, and her evolving political positions have drawn scrutiny. Here are some of the main reasons people, especially from different parts of the political spectrum, have voiced disapproval or dislike of her:

Shift in Political Alignment: Stefanik initially presented herself as a moderate Republican, focusing on issues like bipartisan solutions and maintaining a relatively centrist approach. Over time, however, she shifted to a more staunchly conservative stance, aligning closely with Donald Trump and supporting his claims about election fraud. This pivot alienated many moderate and liberal constituents who had previously supported her.

Role in Trump's Impeachment Defense and Election Denial: Stefanik was a vocal defender of Trump during his impeachment proceedings and later challenged the results of the 2020 presidential election. Her stance on these issues, including supporting objections to certifying the electoral college results, has led to criticism, particularly from those who view her as promoting baseless claims about election integrity.

Aggressive Political Style: Her rhetoric has become more combative, often employing harsh criticisms of Democrats and left-leaning policies. Her communication style and aggressive attacks on opponents, particularly on social media, have alienated some who feel this approach stokes division.

Replacement of Liz Cheney in House Leadership: When Liz Cheney was removed from her position as the House Republican Conference Chair due to her outspoken criticism of Trump, Stefanik was chosen to replace her. Critics viewed this as Stefanik embracing Trump-aligned loyalty over principles, contrasting sharply with her previous, more independent stance.

Criticism of Policy Focus: Some critics argue that Stefanik's shift in focus towards more partisan, "culture war" issues, like criticizing immigration policy and focusing on "radical left" agendas, detracts from her attention to traditional conservative values or the needs of her district. This shift has led to accusations that she's prioritizing national ambitions over local representation.

Accusations of Opportunism: Due to her changing political positions and strong support of Trump, some see Stefanik as being primarily politically opportunistic, prioritizing her career over consistent values. This perception has caused frustration among her detractors, who feel her actions are motivated more by political gain than principle.

Association with Controversial Figures: Stefanik has openly supported Trump and aligned with figures within the GOP who are known for divisive or far-right views, which has alienated more moderate or independent voters and drawn criticism from the left.

While Stefanik has significant support within the GOP base, these factors explain why others, including former allies, have grown critical of her trajectory and political strategies.